<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Comity Technology Advisors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comityadvisors.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comityadvisors.com</link>
	<description>Providing analysis and advice at the intersection where business, social media and technology converge.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>6 Degrees of Social Interactions</title>
		<link>http://comityadvisors.com/uncategorized/6-degrees-of-social-interactions/</link>
		<comments>http://comityadvisors.com/uncategorized/6-degrees-of-social-interactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comityadvisors.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Footnote &#8211; This is one of my favorite topics, one that I will be exploring further in the upcoming weeks. It was written a few weeks ago)
I penned a post yesterday, on the CRMOutsiders,  blog titled Are all Interactions Social Interaction? The  post was a little more sarcastic than my usual rants and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><em>(Footnote &#8211; This is one of my favorite topics, one that I will be exploring further in the upcoming weeks. It was written a few weeks ago)</em></p>
<p>I penned a post yesterday, on the <a href="http://www.crmoutsiders.com/2010/03/25/when-is-an-interaction-a-social-interaction/">CRMOutsiders,  blog</a> titled <em>Are all Interactions Social Interaction</em>? The  post was a little more sarcastic than my usual rants and I think it  caught a few folks who do not know me a bit off guard. I start the post  with the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;SugarCRM is holding its <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/events/sugarcon" target="_blank">annual    customer, developer and partner conference</a>, April 12-14, in San    Francisco. The venue is the cool <a href="http://www.sfpalace.com/index.php" target="_blank">Palace   Hotel</a>.  It is going to be a great event, with some really great   presenters,  panelists, as well as an <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/events/sugarcon/travel.html#entertainment" target="_blank">awesome evening event</a> at the California Academy of    Sciences.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I went on further to suggest that I did a little bit of a &#8216;bait and  switch&#8217;. I even posed a question to myself: &#8220;is what I did appropriate?&#8221;  My idea was to draw people in with a topic intended to create some  conversation, but was it really a marketing message in disguise? &#8211; not a  very <em>Social</em> thing to do. The post was prompted by a<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/social-crm-pioneers/browse_thread/thread/1c0fa9c414d8377d"> question posed</a> by Bob Thompson, the CEO of CustomerThink. The  question is: &#8220;Can you  do  Social CRM without Social  Media/Networks?&#8221;  In order to answer that question, first the question of what determines  if an interaction is a Social interaction needs to be answered.</p>
<p><strong>Is every Interaction a Social Interaction?</strong></p>
<p>The conclusion I reached, possibly prematurely, is &#8220;No&#8221; not every  interaction is a Social Interaction.  The post did have some back and  forth with people willing to share their thoughts. I may need to retract  my conclusion, or at least alter it. It it not really binary, it is a  continuum, and there are degrees of social. Phil Soffer, Vice President  of Product Marketing at Lithium  Technologies <a href="http://lithosphere.lithium.com/t5/Social-CRM-Matters/What-s-Social-About-Social-CRM-Communication/ba-p/5601">wrote  a great post</a> which I think gets to the heart of the matter. Phil  suggests the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;a more rigorous definition of the forms that Social CRM interaction   takes. I&#8217;m not talking about channels here: Facebook versus Twitter, or   whatever. I&#8217;m talking more about norms and expectations that govern  the  interaction.&#8221;</p>
<p>Phil went on the discuss the Typology of Social CRM Sociability. I  agree with the concept, and even some of the specifics. I would like add  a bit to this and state the following, <em>the intent of an  interaction  speaks much more to the Sociability than the channel used.</em> I can  broadcast a commercial on YouTube, do nothing but send spam links on  Twitter just as easily as I can pick up the phone or send an email to a  group of people &#8211; which is Social which is not?</p>
<p><strong>The 6 Degrees of Social Interactions</strong></p>
<p>Here are examples of the 6 Degrees of Social Interactions from the  Customer perspective. Since this is a continuum, as you progress from  1-6, the characteristics suggest that the customer is becoming a Social  Customer.</p>
<ol>
<li>I said what I am said, really not hoping for a response, just action  &#8211; monologue</li>
<li>I am talking, hoping for acknowledgment, not necessarily a response,  but might be nice &#8211; venting</li>
<li>We are talking, but the conversation is a bit one sided &#8211; skewed</li>
<li>I am actively asking for information, will not be happy until I get  it &#8211; social pressure</li>
<li>We are engaged in a conversation and others may join in to push  things forward &#8211; objective</li>
<li>A community of conversations Many to Many &#8211; icing on the cake</li>
</ol>
<p>Here are examples of the 6 Degrees of Social Interaction from the  Business&#8217;s Perspective. Since this is a continuum, as you progress from  1-6, the characteristics suggest that the Business is becoming a Social  Business.</p>
<ol>
<li>Here is my press release, look at me &#8211; broadcast</li>
<li>Register and Download my whitepaper &#8211; broadcast with bait</li>
<li>We are listening, but I am really waiting to talk &#8211; pretending</li>
<li>We are blogging and hoping the message makes it out untarnished &#8211;  comment, nicely please</li>
<li>The Facebook Fanpage is set up, I hope everyone is nice &#8211;  &lt;fingers crossed&gt;</li>
<li>A community of conversations Many to Many &#8211; objective</li>
</ol>
<p>Is 6 Degrees enough? Probably not, the title sounded cool though.  This is analog, not digital. How does this play into Social CRM and  answering Bob&#8217;s question? Share your thoughts, mine are still gelling  and I will share my thoughts in my next post. The short answer is yes,  Social CRM can be done without Social Media/Networks, because Social CRM  is as much about culture and other soft &#8211; but important &#8211; change  management ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://comityadvisors.com/uncategorized/6-degrees-of-social-interactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

